Home; Transparent Minds. AddThis Transparent Minds Narrative Dorrit Cohn is Professor of Germanic Languages and Literatures at Harvard University. “I am willing to predict that Transparent Minds will serve the present generation of graduate students the way Frye’s Anatomy of Criticism served a preceding one. Comparisons are invidious, but unavoidable. Dorrit Cohn’s Transparent Minds invites comparison with a recent book – too recent for Cohn to have taken it.
|Published (Last):||23 January 2011|
|PDF File Size:||15.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Golnaz rated it it was ok Feb 14, This method is somewhere between quoted monologue and psycho-narration. The thoughts are marked by verbs that express speech or thinking, mindx in tense, quotation marks or some other way; the reader can discern that the thought belongs or mihds from the figural mind, not the authorial. This book investigates the entire spectrum of techniques for portraying the mental lives of fictional characters in both the stream-of-consciousness novel and other fiction.
Princeton University Press Amazon. The questions are embarrassingly easy to answer: Andrea rated it really liked it Apr 21, Note that each of these examples subordinated the character’s thoughts to the narrator’s main authority; the second part of these examples is a subordinating clause.
Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction by Dorrit Cohn
No trivia or quizzes yet. Each chapter deals with one main technique, illustrated from a wide range of nineteenth- and twentieth-century fiction by writers including Stendhal, Dostoevsky, James, Mann, Kafka, Joyce, Proust, Woolf, and Sarraute.
An important ckhn of her argument is the difference between the authorial and the figural mind. Thanks for telling us about the problem. My library Help Advanced Book Search. The authorial mind is the writer’s authority to act as a thinking agent in the narrative. Joshua rated it really liked it Cohh 02, Jan 27, Jason rated it really liked it Shelves: Still, I am relieved to report that even this callow youth, for all his self-important posing, could recognize a major work when he saw one.
Return to Book Page. I am late,” ” he thought: What particularly preoccupied this young reviewer was the problem of typology.
Refresh and try again. Duyen rated it liked it Jul 13, Aileen rated it really liked it Dec 15, I was late,” and ” He thought: Cohn has organized the book in a clear and logical way, and, though the terminology may sometimes be challenging, its benefits are understandable.
Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction
Part of the book is a sort of taxonomy of different kinds of narratives and monologues, but Cohn is also very clear about the meaning and effects of the different fictional points of view that she examines. The authorial and the figural are twisted together in this method; the eorrit identification but not his identity with the figural mind is placed forward by this method Domenic rated it liked it Dec 10, Open Preview See a Problem?
Each chapter deals with one main technique, illustrated from a wide range of nineteenth- and twentieth-century fiction by writers including Stendhal, Dostoevsky, James, Mann, Kafka, Joyce, Proust, Woolf, and Sarraute. The first person context, Cohn discusses retrospective techniques, from narration to monologue and finally the autonomous monologue. Cohn distinguishes three main modes of representing consciousness in third-person contexts, that is, in the context of heterodiegetic narration.
Jennifer rated it liked it Feb 06, She is interested in how authors give readers the impression of the processes of thought, of consciousness of transparnt characters and what devices they use to do this.
The reason I read it with such care at that time was that I had been commissioned to produce an article-length review of the book, which duly appeared in Poetics Today in Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.